| Almanac |
| Jesse Ventura Talks to Mary Lahammer |
| Original Broadcast Date: 12/17/2010 |
| The governor-turned-TV-host sat down Friday with Mary Lahammer. They talked about a lot of things including airport security and Minnesota's newest governor. |
Almanac http://www.mnvideovault.org/mpml_player_embed.php?vid_id=21476&select_index=0 |
| Jesse Ventura Talks to Mary Lahammer |
| Original Broadcast Date: 12/17/2010 |
| The governor-turned-TV-host sat down Friday with Mary Lahammer. They talked about a lot of things including airport security and Minnesota's newest governor. |
| Written by Nancy LaRoche |
| Sunday, 07 November 2010 06:21 |
Join in with a farewell song to our Ex-Madame House Majority Speaker, with our friends at RightChange.com: Dim lights Embed ' readOnly name=""> Share this TRUE NORTH article with your social network now! |
3Nov2010 Election Results -all results are unofficial until certified by State Canvassing Board
-State Canvassing Board meets at 10 a.m. Tuesday, November 23, 2010, State Office Building, Room 10
 Crow Wing County Voter FraudThis 17-minute video documents a case of potential voter fraud that occurred in Crow Wing County. On Friday, October 29th, 2010, a member of the Minnesota Freedom Council witnessed apparent voter fraud occurring at the Crow Wing County Courthouse in Brainerd, Minnesota. Upwards of 100 residents from a local group home for mentally disadvantaged individuals were brought into the County Courthouse to cast absentee ballots. The witness reported that supervisors were telling voters to cast a straight Democrat ticket. There was even a report of a voter prematurely leaving the voting both and a supervisor casting the ballot for the voter. Essentially, the people in-charge were taking advantage of the mentally disabled in order to bolster the vote for their candidates of choice. These individuals involved can be charged with a felony under Minnesota election laws. Formal complaints are in the process of being filed with the Crow Wing County Attorney. Now more than ever, we need to safeguard the integrity of our election system. For more information on what you can do, see our Action Plan. |
.bmp)
|
Speechless - Dan McGrath on Election Integrity10 min - Jul 7, 2009 - Uploaded by DanAtMnMajority Dan McGrath is the guest on Tim Kinley's Speechless, June 25th. He discusses dead voters, voter registrations with non ... youtube.com - Related videos |
Alaska Politics Blog: Canvas effort for Murkowski under way
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
v. Arch.
Oct 28, 2010 ... Dozens of people flooded the Midtown Division of Elections office this afternoon to register as write-in candidates for Tuesday's U.S. ...
www.washingtonexaminer.com/.../anti-murkowski-alaskans-rush-to-register-
No. 08-304. Argued November 30, 2009--Decided March 30, 2010
The False Claims Act (FCA) authorizes both the Attorney General and private qui tam relators to recover from persons who make false or fraudulent payment claims to the United States, but it bars qui tam actions based upon the public disclosure of allegations or transactions in, inter alia, "a congressional, administrative, or Government Accounting Office [(GAO)] report, hearing, audit, or investigation." 31 U. S. C. §3730(e)(4)(A). Here, federal contracts provided that two North Carolina counties would remediate areas damaged by flooding and that the Federal Government would
Sharon has voted pdf, challenges that MN has wilfully failed to implement E-Commerce e-Voting http://www.sharon4anderson.org/ Reserves the Right 62cv09-1163(VAndenorth) 62cv10-112(Lindman) to challenge Elections/Taxes in these pending files. ELECTIONS BASED ON FRAUD MUST BE VACATED.
Saint Paul, MN | KUDOS TO www.twincities.com with 4 Candidates charging Lori Swanson with Serious,Deliberate,Major Crimes while in Office MS609.43, Endorsement is covert, complicity. Proud that Dr. Barden has updated his web site with pdf Forensic Files Sharon_Bill_Dave must force the Governor to Convene Grand Jury Proceedings for the Public Good. Barden is doing a great Job. Endorsement of Lori must be recinded/vacated. http://twitter.com/ Dave where is your twitter.com account www.twitter.com/sharon4anderson Check Barden's pdf files www.barden4ag.com and Bill Dahn's Grand Jury http://www.angelfire.com/mn3/billdahn/wvotis.... http://www.topix.net/forum/source/twincities-... http://www.mnvideovault.org/index.php... David www.theresourceparty.org www.**** www.billdahn.com www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com 257 NW.2d, 361 State of Minnesota ex rel. J. J. WILD, M. D., Ph. D., Appellant, v. James C. OTIS, Esquire, Respondent. State of Minnesota ex rel. J. J. WILD, M. D., Ph. D., Appellant, v. Oscar R KNUTSON, Esq., et al., Respondents. Nos. 4689S, 46882. Supreme Court of Minnesota. Aug. 12, 1977. Private citizen filed complaint against defendants alleging violation of criminal laws against conspiracy to commit a crime, corruptly influencing a legislator and violation of criminal law against perjury. The District Court, Hennepin and Ramsey Counties, Allen Oleisky, and Sidney P. Abramson, JJ., dismissed complaints, and private citizen appealed. The Supreme Court Sheran, C. J., hold that private citizen could not commence and maintain private prosecution for alleged violations of criminal law. Affirmed. |
2. Judges
Appellate judges must decide for themselves whether recusal be required in case in which party claims bias.
3. Judges
In action wherein private citizen sought to commence and maintain private prosecutions for alleged violations of criminal law, judges determined that affidavit of prejudice filed by plaintiff against them it was without justification. M.S.A. §§ 609.176, subd. 2, 609.426, 609.48.
