SHARON OPPOSES SHARIA LAW, IF REPUGNANT TO WOMANS RIGHTS.
Sharon4Anderson liked a video |
News Flash dtd Wed. Aug4th,2010 http://www.sos.state.mn.us/index.aspx?page=520
TO : Minnesota Judicial Center Chief Justice Gildea re: MS2.724 via Appointment
Phone: (651) 297-7650 Chief Justice Lorie.Skjerven. Gildea
 | Appointed as Chief Justice on May 13, 2010. Term expires Jan. 2013. Appointed as Associate Justice on January 11, 2006Lorie Gildea
28 USCS 453: Solemn Oath of Justices and Judges Each justice or judge of the United States shall take the following oath or affirmation before performing the duties of his office: "I, ________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as ________ under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God." Sharon may lose the Primary, but must have Standing_Stand UP4JudicialReform,to continue these Major, Serious Issues to notify the Taxpaying/Voting Public of what We Pay For. |
Due process is the principle that the government must respect all of the legal rights that are owed to a person according to the law. Due process holds the government subservient to the law of the land, protecting individual persons from the state.
http://sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/mn-judge-edward-toussaint-a09-2031/
Date: Sunday, January 10, 2010, 2:05 PM " COURTS IGNORING FORENSIC FILES OF WIRE,BANKFRAUD OF THE RAMSEY CO. AUDITOR MARK OSWALD AND LARUA MANNING" re: 62cv09-1163(VAndenorth) 62cv10-112(Lindman)
http://macsnc.courts.state.mn.us/pubdocs/COA/Storage/ORA092031-1207.pdf A09-2031
 | Chief Judge Minnesota Judicial CenterHonorable Edward Toussaint, Jr., was appointed Chief Judge of the Minnesota Court of Appeals in 1995 and was reappointed Chief Judge in 1998, 2001, 2004 and 2007. He was appointed to Hennepin County District Court in 1992.
Phone: (651) 297-7650 Edward Toussaint, Jr. Court of Appeals View Chief Judge Edward Toussaint, Jr.'s full bio » |
RE: CANONS CONSTRUCTION Judge Profile
MS 645.Canons of Construction Clarify “Abandoned” A09-2031
FROM: Sharon Anderson aka Peterson-Chergosky aka Scarrella http://www.blogger.com/home
| Chief Judge Ramsey County Courthouse
Phone: (651) 266-8266 Kathleen R. Gearin Member- Steering Committee, MNCIS (Minnesota Court Information System) "Sharon States alleged complicity www.mnccc.org www.manatron.com" unabated by Authorities Ramsey County Elected in 1986, 1992, 1998, and 2004. Current term expires January of 2011. View Chief Judge Kathleen R. Gearin's full bio » Affidavits of Prejudice/RICO Criminal charges of Embellezment of Sharons Equity in her Paid For Home at 1058 Summit Ave. St.Paul,MN 55104, NO STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS ON FRAUD OR MURDER: Gearin also on SCAP Panel, which must be Abolished> http://www.angelfire.com/mn3/andersonadvocates/panelorder.html The Taxpaying/Voting Public have the Right and Privilege to disclosure that Lesbian Judge's ruling on Committments_ Costing Taxpayers a Fortune_ Covertly Covered up by Chris Barden on the SECRET COURT TO COMMITT THE CITIZENERY. Gearin had reduced the Andersons to Poverty 1988 http://www.justice.gov/crt/crim/3631fin.php http://www.justice.gov/crt/crim/statutes.php
Triggering the Murder of Sharons 2nd Husband Cpl Jim
Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law, 18 U.S.C. § 242. This provision makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. Private Right of Action, 18 U.S.C. § 1595 Intimidation of Voters, 18 U.S.C. § 594
National Voter Registration Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1973gg-10(1)
Anderson www.slideshare.com/sharon4anderson www.scribd.com/sharon4anderson unabated for years by the DFL AG's and Co. Attorneys. |
| JUDGE -2ND DISTRICT COURT 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Candidate Name | Party | Website | File Date | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| KATHLEEN GEARIN | Nonpartisan |
| 5/19/2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| COUNTY ATTORNEY | |||||
| Candidate Name | Party | Website | File Date | ||
| JOHN CHOI | Nonpartisan | votejohnchoi.com
| 5/18/2010 | ||
| TAMMY PUST | Nonpartisan | http://www.tammypust.com/
| 5/18/2010 | ||
| DAVID SCHULTZ | Nonpartisan | schultzforcountyattorney.com
| 5/18/2010 | ||
| ATTORNEY GENERAL | |||||
| Candidate Name | Party | Website | File Date | ||
| BILL DAHN | Independence | http://www.billdahn.com/
| 6/1/2010 | ||
| SHARON ANDERSON | Republican | http://www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com/
| 5/19/2010 | ||
| CHRIS BARDEN | Republican | http://www.barden4ag.com/
| 5/25/2010 | ||
| LEO F. MEYER | Democratic-Farmer-Labor |
| 6/1/2010 | ||
| LORI SWANSON | Democratic-Farmer-Labor | http://www.loriswanson.com/
| 5/20/2010 | ||
| DAVID J. HOCH | The Resource Party |
| 6/1/2010 | ||
| JUDGE -1ST DISTRICT COURT 8 | |||||
| Candidate Name | Party | Website | File Date | ||
| STEPHEN ALLAN BAKER | Nonpartisan | bakerforjudge2010.com
| 5/19/2010 | ||
| TIMOTHY L. BLAKELY | Nonpartisan | JudgeBlakely.com
| 5/18/2010 | ||
| LARRY CLARK | Nonpartisan | http://www.electlarryclark.org/
| 5/18/2010 | ||
| COUNTY ATTORNEY | |||||
| Candidate Name | Party | Website | File Date | ||
| JAMES C. BACKSTROM | Nonpartisan |
| 5/18/2010 | ||
| COUNTY SHERIFF | |||||
| Candidate Name | Party | Website | File Date | ||
| MATT BOSTROM | Nonpartisan | http://www.bostromforsheriff.com/
| 5/18/2010 | ||
| BOB FLETCHER | Nonpartisan |
| 5/21/2010 | ||
Republicans have their own primary, says Chairman Tony Sutton
Comments(0) Republican Party of Minnesota Chairman Tony Sutton dismissed the idea that Republican voters primary election day — Tuesday, Aug. 10 — would go to the polls with the idea of getting rid of Independence Party (IP)-endorsed gubernatorial candidate Tom Horner by voting for another IP candidate.
“We’ve got our own primary,” said Sutton, noting the challenge by frequent candidate Sharon Anderson of St. Paul against Republican-endorsed attorney general candidate Chris Barden.
There’s “absolutely no buzz,” said Sutton when asked, among Republicans about surgically removing Horner by voting for IP gubernatorial candidate
Leave a reply
Videos for ShariaLaw Video's Music
|  Album Reviews: 0 |
Sure is Strange that you only mention the AG’s Race ie Sharon Anderson 4 Judicial Reform,Separation of Powers,FreeSpeeh_Press,Constitutional Guarantees
Sharon is calling for the Resignation of any “Lawyers” from the Executive,Legislative Branch’s ,violating the Separation of Powers ie: In re: Scarrella4Justice221NW2d http://www.sharon4judge.blogspot.com then the Trial Lawyer “Emmers” acting in concort with “Obama” simulating Legal Process via “Oaths of Office.
Judicial Reforms Needed by JOn Roland NonLawyer for Texas AG http://www.constitution.org
In response to requests to summarize the most important judicial reforms needed, here is a list of some of the most important, with links to further discussion.
Select judges into a pool of judges by sortition, or at random, not by election or appointment, but with some filtering for knowledge and skills.
Assign judges to courts for short terms by sortition. Even members of the Supreme Court would be drawn at random from the general pool of judges.
Have multiple judges assigned to each court, and assign them to cases by sortition.
Expand supreme and other appellate courts to 28 members, and hear cases initially by randomly selected panels of three, appealable to randomly selected panels of nine, and appealable from there to randomly selected panels of 27 (with one spare).
Require that decisions of multi-judge panels be unanimous to sustain a claimed power of government against a claim by a citizen that the government lacks such power.
Mandate reversal of any judgment that does not presume nonauthority for any official act and require strict proof of such authority.
Mandate reversal of any judgment for the prosecution in a trial with mixed issues of law and fact, including all criminal trials, in which parties have been impeded from arguing all issues of law before the jury, except those issues that may not be argued without disclosing evidence properly excluded.
Forbid motions in limine to the prosecution in criminal trials.
Mandate reversal of the conviction in any criminal trial in which the jury has not been instructed to determine whether the charge is authorized by applicable statutes and constitutions, or they have not been provided with copies of such statutes and constitutions, and of legal pleadings on the arguments in the case.
Mandate the suspension, without pay, on the first offense, for one month, of any judge who, having jurisdiction, fails to schedule a hearing on a prerogative writ of quo warranto, habeas corpus, procedendo, mandamus, prohibito, scire facias, or certiorari, within 3 days of it being filed and served on respondant, or to hold a hearing thereon within 20 days, in which the burden of proof shall be on the respondant, failing which judgment shall be rendered in favor of the demandant. The suspension shall be doubled for each subsequent failure.
Mandate the convening of a grand jury of 23 by random selection from each jurisdiction having a population of no more than 3000 persons (village).
Mandate that no more than half the time of the grand jury be spent hearing bills of indictment, and that they shall have at least 4 hours to consider each bill, unless they shall choose otherwise.
Authorize grand juries to issue subpoenas directly rather than only through their courts.
Authorize and direct grand juries to decide the jurisdiction, or lack thereof, or the immunity of any official, for any complaint brought before them.
Authorize grand juries to order the removal of any impediments to access to them by members of the public
Authorize grand juries to issue to any complainant or his designee, not just to public prosecutors, an indictment authorizing criminal prosecution.
Authorize grand juries to investigate any public or private enterprise whose activities may adversely impact the public, and to report their findings.
Mandate that trial and grand juries be convened under the supervision of prior grand juries to insure there is no stacking.
Mandate the reversal of any court decision which treats a recent precedent as binding, and for constitutional issues does not return to the original text and historical evidence of its meaning.
Mandate reversal of any denial of standing of a party to privately prosecute a public right for injunctive or declaratory relief, or on a writ of quo warranto.
Mandate reversal of any disablement or deprivation of life, limb, liberty for more than 24 hours, property, or parental rights without a trial by a jury of 12, including for contempt of court.
Mandate reversal of any restriction on the practice of law without a jury trial.
Mandate reversal of any court decision in which the public was not allowed to record the proceedings, other than to conceal the identities of the jury.
Mandate reversal of any court decision in which the judges do not justify and publish their decision, clearly separating it from summary, findings, and dicta.
This list is subject to revision, so check back from time to time for the latest.
Many of these reforms would now require a constitutional amendment to overcome long chains of precedent. Such amendments are to be found here.
–
Unless you work in law enforcement
Radley Balko August 2, 2010
Ignorance of the law is no excuse. That’s the standard line motorists hear when they say they weren’t aware of the speed limit, or gun owners hear when they say didn’t know about the gun laws in the jurisdiction they happened to get arrested in. Yet that ignorance is pretty understandable in an America where just about everything is being criminalized. At the federal level alone there are now more than 4,500 separate crimes, and that’s not counting the massive regulatory code, violations of which also can sometimes be punished with criminal charges.